New Smartphone Apps Make Giving to Nonprofits Cool

With the recent revolution of smart phone applications and social media, nonprofit organizations are finding new opportunities to reach potential donors.

Recently, I came across a new smartphone app that makes giving to nonprofit organizations simple, fun, and a great way to share your philanthropic giving with your friends.  The name of the app is “Instead”.

The basic concept of this app is pretty simple.  It works by donating a couple dollars to a nonprofit organization “instead” of going to the theatres to see a movie or buying a venti vanilla iced latte from Starbucks or buying a drink at happy hour after work (you get the picture). According to the app’s founders, it is about “encouraging people to live within or below their means in order to give”.  I’ve recently downloaded this app on my i-phone and I was pleasantly surprised on how this app makes giving easy and a natural part of your day. 

For nonprofit organizations to be added to the nonprofit database and begin receiving donations, all you have to do is visit instead.com and submit your organization’s information. A committee will review the submission and inform your organization in a reasonable time period whether it was approved or denied.

Apps like Instead can be a great way for nonprofit organizations to receive small donations in a big way.

Danny Oertle

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


What the Yellow Book Update Means for You

Some of you may have heard that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has recently updated the Government Auditing Standards for the Yellow Book this year.  Some of you may be wondering how is this update going to affect me, or what is my auditor going to be asking for that I should be prepared for?  Well, among the seven chapters and over 200 pages of information that you and your auditor should be familiar with is a substantial change to the independence standards that will come into effect for periods ending on or after December 15, 2012 but will begin having implications as soon as January 1, 2012.  These independence standards can be found in chapter 3 of the Yellow Book which can be found by going to the U.S. Government Accountability Office website or clicking on this link: http://www.gao.gov/yellowbook.

The reason the new independence rules may have implications starting as soon as January 1, 2012 is based on whether or not your auditor performs what the GAO calls non-audit services.  These can vary depending on each particular situation and relationship you may have with your auditor, but some examples of what may be considered a non-audit service are when your auditor is preparing:

1. Financial statements or your Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR),
2. Journal entries other than proposed audit entries,
3. Maintaining your capital asset schedules or
4. Bookkeeping services

When this is the case your auditor will be required to perform and document an assessment of “threats” to the independence of the auditor, whether or not management of your organization possesses suitable Skills, Knowledge, or Experience (SKE) to properly and effectively oversee the non-audit services, and establish an understanding with your organizations management regarding the non-audit services to be performed.  Most audit firms have already been doing some level of this type of assessment in the past, but what is new is the requirement to document each part of this requirement for each audit before the non-audit services are rendered.  It is important to note that Yellow Book independence requirements must be met before non-audit services are performed in the year, or for the year, being audited.  This means if your auditor is performing a non-audit service in October 2012, such as drafting your CAFR for the June 30, 2012 year end, and you will retain your auditor for the June 30, 2013 year end, then those non-audit services were rendered during your year ended June 30, 2013 and should have been assessed and documented before they were performed.

What does this mean for me?  Well in short, you should expect to see your auditor ask specific questions regarding your SKE, if they have not already done so in the past.  This may include:

1. Your level of education
2. Your years of experience performing your current duties
3. The number of years you have been at your position with your organization
4. Whether you have a clear understanding of the nature of the services being performed and knowledge of your organization’s mission and operations.

You should also expect to have a conversation with your auditor, or an addition to your engagement letter, establishing both the auditor’s and your (or management’s) understanding established for the non-audit services to be performed.  Your auditor will also be required to establish and document certain safe guards to maintain their independence with your organization.  This may include an independent review of the non-audit services performed by an individual in the audit firm that has the suitable experience and knowledge to review the services but was not involved with the non-audit services or the audit in question. 

The GAO does not require you to possess the technical qualifications to perform or re-perform the non-audit service but they do require you to understand the services sufficiently to oversee those services.  Your auditor may already have requested you to review certain disclosure checklists when reviewing your statements in the past; this can be another type of safe guard that your auditor will document in the assessment of their independence with your organization.

At a very minimum, you will be required to assume all management responsibilities, evaluate the adequacy and results of the services performed, and accept responsibility for the results of the services.  So it is important to maintain very open levels of communication with your auditor so you are aware of what, when and where your non-audit services are being performed as well as maintain all management decisions in relation to those services.

We encourage all entities requiring a Yellow Book audit to go to the provided link in this blog and read chapter 3 of the new Yellow Book, as well as the remainder of the Yellow Book, to fully understand the implications of the standards that have been updated.

Brian Hemmerle, CPA

Posted in Government, Yellow Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Compensated Absences

“Compensated absences” refers to employee absences for which employees will be paid, including vacation and sick leave.  Expenses are normally recognized during the period for which the employee provides services qualifying that employee for compensated absences.  If the employment policy specifically dictates, a liability is accrued for unused portion of such compensated absences.  Liabilities are accrued when all of the following conditions are met:

1) Services have already been rendered by the employees;
2) Rights have vested or accumulated; (rights are considered vested if those rights are not contingent upon an employee’s future service and would be paid to the employee when that employee leaves service; rights accumulate when they are earned, but unused, and may be carried forward to future periods).
3) Payment is probable;
4) Amount can be reasonably estimated.

It is vital that an entity’s personnel manual or handbook include specifics for any such policy.  It should include the formula for earning vacation and sick pay, the maximum annual accruals permitted, and the policy for payment, if permitted, of each category upon termination of employment.  For the entity recording the liability to its books for such compensated absences, the following guidelines should be used:

Vacations: accrue a liability for leave earned and vested, but not used at year end.

Sick leave (and similar absences, if vested): accrue a liability to the extent that an employee  would be compensated for such benefits through cash payments conditioned on employee termination or retirement.

The compensated absences liability should be calculated based on the pay rate in effect at the  date of the Balance Sheet or Statement of Net Assets.  The accumulations should be reduced to  the maximum amount allowed as a termination payment.  Salary-related payments which are  associated with the payment of compensated absences, such as employer’s share of payroll  taxes, must also be accrued.

Governmental Funds – recognize expenditures each period using the modified accrual method  of accounting – expenditure is recognized equal to the net amount accrued during the year that  normally would be liquidated with expendable available financial resources.

Proprietary Funds and Government-wide Financial Statements –compensated absences liability  should  be comprised of two components – amounts currently due within one year and  amounts due in more than one year (the non-current portion). Expense for vacation leave is  recorded when earned. 

Jill Collins

Posted in Government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s (GASB) Addition to the Financial Statement Elements and Implementation of GASB 65

GASB has added two elements to the original five financial statement elements.  GASB Statement No. 65 Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities, issue guidance on using the new elements.  The two new elements are Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflow of Resources.  GASB’s seven financial statement elements are defined as follows:

Assets- resources with present service capacity that the government presently controls;
Liabilities-present obligations to sacrifice resources that the government has little or no discretion to avoid;

Deferred Outflows of Resources-consumption of net assets by the government that is applicable to a future reporting period;

Deferred Inflows of Resources-acquisition of net assets by the government that is applicable to a future reporting period;

Net Position-the residual of all other elements presented in a statement of financial position;

Inflows of Resources-acquisition of net assets by the government that is applicable to the reporting period;

Outflows of Resources-consumption of net assets by the government that is applicable to the reporting period.

GASB 65 also directs the use of the term “deferred” to be used exclusively with Deferred Outflows of Resources or Deferred Inflows of Resources.  The two new elements will include items that, until now, have been reported as assets or liabilities and will be reclassified into the new elements.  GASB 65 also identifies items currently being reported as assets or liabilities that should be reported as Outflows of Resources or Inflows of Resources.

So, what needs to be done to implement GASB 65?  Government staff needs to review the government-wide and proprietary statements and 1) reclassify assets and liabilities that now belong in Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows and 2) remove those assets and liabilities that should no longer be reported on the Statement of Net Assets.  GASB 65 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2012 but earlier implementation is encouraged.  The cumulative effect of implementing this statement should be reported as a restatement of beginning net assets.

Jessica Puckett, CPA, CFE

Posted in Financial Statements, Not-For-Profit (non-profit) Accounting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Vendor or Subrecipient? How to Tell the Difference

Single audit requirements say that an entity which passes federal funds on to a subrecipient must perform certain monitoring procedures to ensure the subrecipient is compliant with OMB compliance guidelines. But how can you tell if you have passed the funds on to a subrecipient or simply paid a vendor?

The answer to this question may not always be easy. As defined in OMB Circular A-133, Section 105, a subrecipient is an “entity that expends Federal awards received from a pass-through entity to carry out a Federal program” whereas a vendor is defined as “a dealer, distributor, merchant, or other seller providing goods or services that are required for the conduct of a Federal program.”

With these definitions there can still be some confusion if an entity is a vendor or subrecipient, especially those entities that are service related. Some characteristics of a service entity that is a subrecipient include entities that are able to determine who is eligible to receive assistance and if the contract includes performance requirements that are measured against whether federal program objectives are met. 

Meanwhile an entity would be a vendor if they are providing the services within its normal business operations and provides similar services to many different purchasers. In addition, typically a vendor relationship exists if the entity operates in a competitive environment and if the services ancillary to the federal program.

Subrecipient relationships should not be confused as vendor relationships because the requirements related to OMB compliance.

Jeffery Patterson, CPA

Posted in Government, Single Audit | Tagged , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Government Cash Requirements

Recently, while working with a few of our smaller governmental clients, we had recognized a concern by those client regarding their requirements to collateralize and/or maintain deposit balances below the ever changing Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits (FDIC).  We realize how much those working in government finance are constantly bombarded with items in their day to day jobs and we felt it would be a good time to remind everyone of the requirements set forth by the State of Arizona in regards to their cash deposits.

First and foremost, a governmental entity needs to remember their deposits are the citizen’s deposits and they are stewards of those funds, which gives way to why it is so important to ensure those deposits are secured by FDIC coverage or bank collateralization.  Second, the State legally requires, as noted in Arizona Revised Statute §35-323 G and elsewhere in the statutes, that deposit accounts must be maintained with a financial institution that will guarantee their assets by pledging certain assets of a value that covers the total assets of the District by 101%.  This is sometimes not necessary with the FDIC coverage that has been increased and extended to $250,000 per insured bank for interest bearing accounts and the temporarily unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing accounts up through December 31, 2012.  However, if a government finds themselves with interest bearing accounts that exceed $250,000 or they are preparing for non-interest bearing accounts that will exceed $250,000 after December 31, 2012, the governmental entity will want to begin working with their financial institutions to collateralize their deposits up to 101% of the balance at all times.  Unless some unforeseeable change to the FDIC coverage occurs in the next 8 months, it’s time to start calling your banks to arrange for your accounts to be fully covered.

Brian Hemmerle, CPA

Posted in Government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Auditor Term Limits: An Update for Charter Schools

Last fall 2011 I wrote a blog regarding auditor term limits that were slowly creeping their way into governmental audits in the State of Arizona.  The legislature had passed Laws 2011, Chapter 344, sec. 5 and sec.16 of Arizona Revised Statutes §15-183 and §15-914, respectively, in July 2011 requiring Charter Schools to rotate their audit firm every five years starting with the year ended 2012.  However, in less than one year, the legislature had reversed that decision and passed SB 1199 eliminating the requirement that charter schools rotate their auditors every so many years.  The law was signed by Governor Brewer on March 30, 2012.

Brian Hemmerle, CPA

Posted in Government, Term Limits | Tagged , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


What is Emancipation Day?

WOO HOOO! Talk to most of your tax professionals and they are counting the hours left today. Why today you ask? Because it’s tax day!

Wait… you thought taxes were due on April 15th? Wrong! The 15th was a weekend, and the IRS doesn’t “do” weekends, so they gave an extra day.

So that means taxes were due on the 16th? Wrong again. Washington, DC celebrates Emancipation Day so the IRS is closed on the 16th of April. If you are like most people, you are wondering what Emancipation Day is and why you don’t get the day off too. Honestly, if you go to Wikipedia and get more info on it, it becomes more of a “why does DC celebrate the holiday?” There are only a few states in the US that celebrate it (along with many of the Caribbean countries) but none seem to celebrate on the same day of the year. It ranges from April 16, May 8, June 19, August 8 depending on the state.

There is something to the holiday though. It is the date that African slaves were emancipated, and the various dates represent when it happened in that area (either when they learned of the national Act signed by President Abraham Lincoln, or when the state did away with slavery. And for those who don’t get to celebrate Emancipation Day, for this year, at least, it meant one more day to get those taxes filed!

We now return you to your regularly broadcast audit and accounting update…

Katie Thomas, CPA

Posted in Taxes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Check Out GFOA’s Six New Best Practices that were Adopted in January 2012

In January 2012, the Government Finance Officers Association’s Executive Board adopted 2 new Best Practices and revised 4 Best Practices.  The 2 new Best Practices are as follows:

Presentation of the Departmental Section in Operating Budget Document – This document provides guidance to governments on how to meet their programs and services objectives.  The departmental section of a government’s operating budget document should be well defined and well designed to enable to reader to understand the purpose of the governments services and programs along with the cost associated with the programs.

Establishing and Administering an OPEB Trust – This best practice recommends the government create a qualified trust to prefund their OPEB obligations.  Governments should consult with qualified legal counsel to understand the complexities of establishing and administering an OPEB Trust.

The 4 Best Practices that were revised are as follows:

The Public Finance Officers Role in Sustainability – This best practice offers tasks that government finance personnel can assume to support sustainability.

Expenses Charged by Underwriters in Negotiated Sales – There is a new Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) fee that will be assessed on dealer firms relating to bond issuances.  This best practice recommends bond issuers have an agreement with the underwriter for direct and indirect expenses charged during a bond sale.  The agreement should clearly state that the issuer will not pay the new GASB fee.

Managing Build America and other Direct Subsidy Bonds – There are ongoing responsibilities with the Build America and other Direct Subsidy Bond issues.  This best practice provides guidance regarding the post-sale responsibilities relating to IRS requirements and subsidy timely payments.

Using Mutual Funds for Cash Management Purposes – This best practice reminds management to be vigilant about reviewing/monitoring their investment portfolio regarding specific mutual fund holdings.  A government should develop a policy relating to the appropriate levels of short and intermediate term holdings.

More information regarding the Government Finance Officers Association best practices can be found at www.gfoa.org.

Marilyn Mays, CPA

Posted in Best Practices, Government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


6 Methods to Implement in Detecting Workplace Fraud

In these economically stressful times, pressure and incentive to perpetrate fraud are more plentiful. Employers must address fraud risk more rigorously than ever before. Annual communication with the entity’s auditor can help pinpoint areas of higher risk.  Once identified, these areas can become the focus of management brainstorming sessions to develop processes to heighten awareness and to develop preventive measures.   

More immediately, however, some economical interim methods which may be implemented to address fraud risk include the following:

a) Management visibility  – be proactive in making the rounds of the various staff offices to provide opportunities for face-to-face conversations with employees, both to answer questions and to listen to their thoughts and issues involving the workplace;
b) Appoint a liaison – if your organization has staff employed outside of the normal office situation, consider appointing a member of the “outside” staff to relay any concerns or problems back to management; if the atmosphere may not be conducive to direct employee contact with management, consider appointing a liaison from among the “rank and file” to relay problems or concerns;
c) Ask outsiders – vendors, customers, and others who come in contact with your employees may be able to relay concerns overheard in conversations with employees.  Outsiders may be able to relate areas vulnerable to employee misconduct or business practices which might provide opportunity or incentive for fraud;
d) Suggestion box or confidential employee surveys – this may provide a less risky means for an employee to share suspicions of or known employee misconduct, or to provide information regarding issues they are hesitant to speak about openly.
e) Identify an open door – ensure that at least one member of management has an advertised “open door” so that employees with concerns have a comfortable avenue of approach to management without the need for more formal, written communication. 
f) Exit interviews – once an employee will no longer have to face his peers, he may be more likely to share information he may have been uncomfortable sharing previously. 

All of the above have virtually no additional cost to the employer, and will provide additional avenues for discerning problem areas or personnel.  None of them, however, will replace management vigilance and constant involvement in the day to day processes of the workplace.

Jill Collins

Posted in Fraud, Government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

Leave a comment


Welcome


Our Not-For-Profit/Governmental niche is a strong team of experienced professionals who focus their work in these industries. Henry & Horne has been a stable local firm in Arizona for 55 years, and the Not-For-Profit/Governmental niche has a long history of working with governmental organizations, charitable organizations, and other tax exempt organizations of all kinds. Our focus is exceptional client service and building relationships with our clients to promote communication throughout the year, not just at the time of the annual audit. We highly value and are very proud to be helping those who help others.

Web Designer Phoenix | Arizona website Design | Web Design Phoenix