<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The 411 on Employee Benefit Plans &#187; EBSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/tag/ebsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services</link>
	<description>Valuable Information on 401k&#039;s, Pensions, ESOP&#039;s, Form 5500 Preparation &#38; much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Planned Changes to the Regulatory Definition of Fiduciary</title>
		<link>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/planned-changes-to-the-regulatory-definition-of-fiduciary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/planned-changes-to-the-regulatory-definition-of-fiduciary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fiduciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Casa Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Scottsdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Tempe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial asset appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[five-part standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan sponsors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party payments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) plans to amend the regulatory definition of “fiduciary.” A large number of plan sponsors rely on the services of pension consultants and financial asset appraisers. As such, in June 2010, EBSA will propose to amend the current definition to include these service providers, essentially making them subject to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) plans to amend the regulatory definition of “fiduciary.” A large number of plan sponsors rely on the services of pension consultants and financial asset appraisers. As such, in June 2010, EBSA will propose to amend the current definition to include these service providers, essentially making them subject to the fiduciary responsibility rules established by ERISA. According to Phyllis Borzi, Assistant Secretary of Labor for the EBSA, “The DOL is concerned about conflicts, the fact that there may be consulting services provided in a conflicted manner where the self-dealing restrictions presently do not apply.”</p>
<p>The current regulations state that consultants and investment advisers are generally not considered fiduciaries unless they exercise discretionary authority or control over a plan’s investment transactions or meet a five-part standard. One of the major concerns with these current fiduciary regulations is that they don’t require consultants to disclose all of their compensation arrangements to plan sponsors. Many consultants will avoid fiduciary duties by stating in their contracts that they provide information and non-fiduciary advice to plan sponsors who have fiduciary responsibility over the plan. Another concern is the third-party payments that some investment consultants receive when retirement funds hire money managers recommended by the consultants. Plan sponsors can expect more protection from financial advisers and consultants that act imprudently by subjecting them to ERISA regulations.</p>
<p>Joe Goodmiller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/planned-changes-to-the-regulatory-definition-of-fiduciary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EBSA Releases Additional Guidance on Schedule C Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/ebsa-releases-additional-guidance-on-schedule-c-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/ebsa-releases-additional-guidance-on-schedule-c-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Schedule C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefit community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Casa Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Scottsdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Plans Tempe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA fee recapture account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 5500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frequently asked questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general business relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-ERISA business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-monetary compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotional gifts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employee Benefits Security Administration (&#8221;EBSA&#8221;) announced on October 23, 2009 that they released new guidance to help plan administrators understand and fulfill the expanded requirements for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009 for reporting service provider fee and compensation information on Schedule C of the Form 5500.
This additional guidance is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Benefits Security Administration (&#8221;EBSA&#8221;) announced on October 23, 2009 that they released new guidance to help plan administrators understand and fulfill the expanded requirements for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009 for reporting service provider fee and compensation information on Schedule C of the Form 5500.</p>
<p>This additional guidance is the result of the feedback that the EBSA received from the employee benefit community and contains 25 frequently asked questions on the Schedule C requirements.  It covers such subjects as whether promotional gifts are reportable, how an ERISA fee recapture account should be treated and if the expenses of an entity that provides services to an employee benefit plan to conduct an education conference at no cost to the plan sponsor&#8217;s personnel has to be reported as non-monetary compensation.</p>
<p>The initial guidance about the Schedule C requirements published by the EBSA in July 2008 contains 40 frequently asked questions on the Schedule C requirements covering topics such as if it is required to be reported on the Schedule C if a person providing services to the plan is provided a meal or other entertainment based on a general business relationship that includes both ERISA and non-ERISA business and under what circumstance is a service provider expected to be identified on Schedule C for failing to provide information necessary to complete the Schedule C.</p>
<p>The complete listing of the new frequently asked questions and answers about the Schedule C requirements released in October 2009 can be reviews on the EBSA&#8217;s website at <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-sch-C-supplement.html">http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-sch-C-supplement.html</a>.</p>
<p>The initial frequently asked questions and answers about the Schedule C requirements released in July 2008 can be viewed on the EBSA&#8217;s website at: <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_scheduleC.html">http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_scheduleC.html</a>.</p>
<p>Shannon Titch, CPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hhcpa.com/blogs/employee-benefits-audit-services/ebsa-releases-additional-guidance-on-schedule-c-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
